An overview of the U.S. Electoral System

The U.S. electoral system is unique and complex, which is confusing for some. Here is a look at the functioning of the American electoral system.

In modern democracies, the people choose their leaders through elections, allowing citizens to vote to determine the outcome. The management of elections is governed by electoral systems, and each country possesses its own system. However, there are two major types of elections: direct elections and indirect elections. In a direct election, the population votes directly to elect representatives, whereas in indirect elections, representatives can be either selected or voted for by a legislature or an electoral college, as in the United States.

The U.S. uses a mixed system to determine its representatives, with variations depending on the office being sought. From the local level of mayor to the national level of senator, U.S. elections are conducted through direct votes. The key difference lies in the presidential election, which involves indirect voting through the Electoral College. This system was established by the Founding Fathers, who feared that either the general population or Congress might elect unsuitable leaders for such a significant position (Hamilton). [1]

To address this concern, they established the Electoral College, an indirect system where citizens vote for a group of individuals, usually chosen by their party, who then decide which candidate the state will support in the election. Each state’s electors base their votes on the state’s popular vote results, meaning that the candidate who secures the most popular votes in a state typically wins all of that state’s electoral votes.

In the U.S., there is a common misconception that the candidate with the most popular votes nationwide wins the election. However, this is not always the case for two main reasons. First, states do not have equal populations. For example, Wyoming has 576,851 residents and 3 electoral votes, which means one electoral vote represents 192,284 people. In contrast, Texas has 29 million people and 40 electoral votes, meaning one electoral vote represents 725,000 people. This results in a situation where a vote in Wyoming is 377% more influential than a vote in Texas. Second, electors in the Electoral College are the ones who make the final voting decision. In some cases, electors can be “unfaithful” and choose to vote against their state’s popular vote outcome. In 2016, for instance, four of the twelve electors in Washington State chose not to cast their votes for Hillary Clinton, even though she won the popular vote in that state (Washington Courts, 2019).

Maine and Nebraska, however, differ from the winner-takes-all approach used by other states. They divide their electoral votes proportionally, based on the popular vote in each congressional district. For instance, Nebraska has five electoral votes; if the Republican Party wins the popular vote statewide (2 votes) and one congressional district (1 vote), they will win 3 of Nebraska’s 5 electoral votes.

There are 538 total electors, and a presidential candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win. The number of electors for each state is equal to its number of representatives and senators. For example, California, with 39 million residents, has 55 electors, Texas has 40, and Florida has 30. However, while these states have the most electors, they are not necessarily the most crucial in the election process.

States often maintain political identities that shape their voting behavior. For instance, states in the Southwest, such as Texas and Arizona, where immigration is a major issue, tend to lean Republican and are referred to as “red states.” In contrast, states like New York and Massachusetts, with diverse workforces and post-industrial economies, often support Democratic candidates and are known as “blue states.” Other factors, such as religious beliefs, demographics, and social issues like abortion, can also influence a state’s political leanings.

According to CNN, the current electoral landscape shows that blue states hold a total of 220 electoral votes, red states hold 201, and swing states account for 117 electoral votes. This means that the Democratic Party is leading by 19 electoral votes as of the most recent polls (CNN). Swing states, or states without a clear political preference, are especially important in elections because they can shift between Democratic and Republican candidates depending on the political climate and campaign efforts.

The map above is the latest electoral map by BBC, the States highlighted in yellow in the Electoral Map are the actual States with no preferred Party or candidate. And this is why in presidential elections, candidates focus their efforts on swing states, where the outcome is less predictable. For example, candidates are more likely to campaign in Pennsylvania than in solidly blue California or solidly red Texas. Swing states are crucial because their voting behavior can determine the overall election outcome.

In conclusion, the U.S. electoral system uniquely blends direct and indirect voting, particularly through the Electoral College for presidential elections. This framework balances state representation based on population while recognizing the distinct political identities of blue, red, and swing states. Understanding this system is vital for citizens to engage in the democratic process and comprehend the dynamics that influence political representation in the United States.

---

[1] “It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station… A small number of persons, selected by their fellow citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to so complicated an investigation”. Federalist No. 68. » Founders Online, National Archives.